Thursday, April 30, 2015

Post 6: Listicle


5 REASONS DINAH FROM THE RED TENT BOUNCES BACK FROM EVERYTHING

Dinah, the protagonist in The Red Tent by Anita Diamant, seems to have every wrecking ball thrown at her, from her brothers killing her husband to losing her son. Yet even though there is so much loss around her, she seems able to find the light in everything that happens to her. Proving that she has steel bones and an iron mind.

1.      Her husband dies, yet she finds happiness.

In most movies, when a loved one dies, the person goes through a bout of depression. Especially if their own brothers killed them.Yet in Dinah’s case she moves to Egypt and falls in love with the new country and bonds with her late husband’s mother and the baby growing in her womb. And when her son was born she rejoiced, saying “there should be a song for women to sing…a prayer to recite… no words strong enough to name that moment” (282). This shows that she found solace in the face of her husband’s death.

2.      Her son moves away and she moves on as well.

Dinah was devastated when her son was accepted to a school a long way from home and that she would not see him for many years. She then left her home and found a job she loved: as a midwife; as her mothers were. She welcomed babies into the world and said goodbye to her own. Dinah takes every single bad thing and spins it into a whole new light.

 
 
 
 
 
3.  She falls in love again.

Even though she thought she could never love again, she met Benia and fell in love. And though she had lost everyone, her family, her husband, and her son; she was still willing to accept new people into her life. “We stood… hand in hand and smiling like fools without speaking,” (338). She learned from every loss she had and taught herself to hold onto good things and good people while she still had them. She cherished every moment.

4.      Her brother threatened her son and she took it all in stride.

She reconnects with her son, yet his life is then threatened by her brother who she thought was dead. Her son, Re-Mose, confronted her brother, Joseph, about his father's death; and Joseph responds by condemning Re-Mose. Dinah realizes the brother she had as a little girl was gone and that he was a different man. She deals with this theoretical loss and convinces her brother to save the son who then hated her.

 
5.      She confronts her family who killed her husband and who she abandoned.

Joseph took Dinah back to her family and she confronts the people who she cursed and left behind. She also learned the fate of the mothers she loved and the brothers she looked up to. Even though she swore never to see them again, she said goodbye to her dying father, met her new family, and found consolation with her mothers who had died. Being there “had given me [Dinah] peace… as long as the memory of Jacob lived, my name would be remembered” (397). She took the bad things in her life and learned from them. She found happiness from them.

This is important because it shows that people need to take everything in stride and that no matter what happens to you, it isn’t the end of the world. It gives hope that everything will be ok in the end.

Monday, April 20, 2015

Post 5

In my opinion, to be non-fiction, a book needs to be 100% true. But my view of what is considered non-fiction is a slim margin. Non-fiction, to me, are books that cover events in history or animals or plants or any factual thing that can be researched and backed up. Memoirs do not fall into that category. To me, memoirs are just another novel, just another story. If it actually happened, that's great and it can be truly inspiring. But so can fictional stories. And if there are falsehoods found in memoirs, so what? I mean, what did you expect? Like Seth Greenland said, memory is fallible, you cannot remember every single things exactly as it happened. And in my opinion, our lives are fictional because we view them in different ways (like Laila Lalami discussed) and we all like to believe/interpret events in the way we want to. We are all authors in this way. So I believe it is ok for "memoirs" to be half-truths as in Frey's case. For maybe in his mind, one afternoon in jail felt like 9 months in prison. How can we judge and pick on him for how he portrayed his life? The only things I was not happy with was that he went on talk shows and interviews claiming it was all true.
So is David Shields right? Do we need classifications like fantasy, non-fiction, etc.? I don't think so. I don't think our understanding or liking would change if books were not classified. I even believe people would branch out more in the kind of books they read if there were no genres at all. For example, if someone read a book they did not like that was classified as a mystery, it could ruin the rest of the genre to them. Yet if it was not dubbed "mystery", that person could find another detective book and fall in love with it. Genres do not matter. Books should not be labeled or classified, for they are all unique. Some say books allow you to live a hundred lives. I agree, but I think it's more than that. Reading gives the books themselves life and they capture it with every turn of their pages.